We explain everything, even when there is no reason. We need
a reason for everything-call it purpose. I get when we say there is need for a
purpose in life, to give direction and meaning. I guess even that sense of
identity comes from purpose e.g. how if your purpose was to save life by
becoming a doctor, fulfillment of that gives you the identity of a
caregiver/provider.
But then what about when you hit your head on the window or
it starts to rain when you are indoors?
Once, my dad goes,
‘You see it was good that the cow started jumping in
excitement because we Africans believe life and energy from man to animal to
inanimate matter is interlinked. We are one; hence the jumping was a good sign.”
(Story created due to writer’s
memory lapse on what he said at the time. Put in small size fonts to hopefully
escape your attention, which evidently did not work).
Now, expecting Mathe to refute that theory and replace the
African with a more God-directed explanation, she goes “Now that’s an African
speaking. The days when I used to do fieldwork, while working in public health
in the 90s, you find a child is malnourished and is almost dying. Since the
mother is also pregnant with another baby, she (this was the mzee’s opinion
which was definitely hers) rationalizes it as the way it was meant to be.’ Mind
you, this is not because she is necessarily superstitious, it’s just that for
lack of a way to handle the situation, people turn to anything.
From that example we can conclude that human beings
explain everything to find a way to handle situations. Fullstop. I tend to
think if you are going to use the word ‘fullstop’ or ‘period’ at the end of a
sentence then it doesn’t make sense putting the mark. It is redundant…and
foolish i.e. does not make sense. However, we can explain that too. A paper
titled, ‘the explanation of why humans see need to repeat themselves in symbol
and word’ would make a good read.
African philosophy explains rain, sunshine, a dying blade of
grass, an almost dying one and a broken one too.
Enehu, why not just leave some things as they are? I mean we
have mistakes in everyday life-coincidences that do not add up-but when they
don’t lead to a national disaster we assume them. Saitoti is dead, am sure
wherever he is he would prefer if we looked into the crash to avoid future ones
but not to stoke the human spirit.
Now, explain why the writer felt the urge to post this. 20
marks.
40 marks if you can explain why you need illustrations to elaborate your
point.
No comments:
Post a Comment